S. 4850

S. 4850: A bill to amend title 28, United States Code, to adjust thresholds relating to jurisdiction for inflation.

Passed Senate John Kennedy (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The bill S. 4850 aims to amend Title 28 of the United States Code to update the monetary thresholds that determine federal jurisdiction in civil cases, adjusting these figures for inflation. This means that the minimum amount of money involved in a case for it to be heard in federal court would be increased to reflect changes in the economy over time.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4850 have highlighted the importance of keeping legal thresholds in line with inflation to ensure that the federal court system remains accessible and relevant. They argue that adjusting these thresholds will help streamline the judicial process by better reflecting current economic realities, potentially reducing the burden on federal courts and allowing for more efficient handling of cases.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4850 express concerns that increasing jurisdictional thresholds may limit access to federal courts for individuals with smaller claims. They argue that this could disproportionately affect low-income plaintiffs who rely on federal courts for justice, potentially pushing more cases into overburdened state courts where they may not receive the same level of attention or resources.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

The bill S. 4850 aims to adjust jurisdiction thresholds for inflation, which does not directly intersect with the top donor industries of the sponsor, John Kennedy. His largest donor industry is Health Professionals, contributing $120 million, followed by Retired individuals at $37.5 million. Since there are no direct overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the interests of these donor industries, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. Additionally, the lobbying activity in this policy area does not indicate significant financial influence from the sponsor's top donors, further reducing the risk of conflicts. Voters should be aware that while large donations exist, they do not necessarily correlate with legislative outcomes in this instance.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE THE FARLEY GROUP, INC. $60,000
STEELSHIPS, LLC CONSCIENCE POINT CONSULTING, INC. $45,000
SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS THE FARLEY GROUP, INC. $30,000
PARATEK PHARMACEUTICALS PARATEK PHARMACEUTICALS $20,000
SAN JUAN SOUTHERN PAIUTE TRIBE THE FARLEY GROUP, INC. $15,000
CHURCH ALLIANCE K&L GATES, LLP $10,000
GIFDA RULON & WHITE GOVERNANCE STRATEGIES $10,000
ASSOCIATION FOR PROFESSIONALS IN INFECTION CONTROL AND EPIDEMIOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOR PROFESSIONALS IN INFECTION CONTROL AND EPIDEMIOLOGY undisclosed
KERECIS INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
TERRA-GEN, LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
PHILIPS CONTINENTAL STRATEGY, LLC undisclosed
COLOSSAL BIOSCIENCES INC. MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN BOARDING SCHOOL HEALING COALITION THE FARLEY GROUP, INC. undisclosed
EAST TEXAS COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES undisclosed
AMERICAN TERAWATT, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding John Kennedy, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us