S. 4852

S. 4852: A bill to amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to make fertilizer storage facilities eligible for farm storage facility loans, and for other purposes.

Introduced John Hoeven (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4852 is a bill that aims to amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to allow fertilizer storage facilities to qualify for farm storage facility loans. This change is intended to support farmers by making it easier for them to secure funding for necessary infrastructure related to fertilizer storage.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4852 have praised the bill for its potential to enhance agricultural productivity and sustainability by facilitating better storage solutions for fertilizers. They argue that improved storage can help prevent waste and ensure that farmers have access to the resources they need to maximize crop yields.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4852 express concerns that the bill may lead to increased environmental risks associated with fertilizer storage. They argue that without proper regulations and oversight, expanding storage facilities could result in contamination and other negative impacts on local ecosystems.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The analysis of bill S. 4852, which aims to amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to make fertilizer storage facilities eligible for farm storage facility loans, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Senator John Hoeven, and his top donor industries. The top donor industries do not have a direct stake in fertilizer storage or agricultural financing, which suggests a low risk of conflict of interest. The lobbying activity in this policy area, while notable, does not directly correlate with the specific interests of the bill. For instance, OSF Healthcare System and other listed entities have contributed funds but are not primarily involved in agriculture or fertilizer sectors, indicating that their interests may not conflict with the bill's objectives. Therefore, voters can be reassured that there is minimal risk of undue influence from donors regarding this legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM $60,000
EGAN-JONES RATINGS COMPANY INVARIANT LLC $50,000
GRADIUM MEGA COIN HARTWELL CAPITOL CONSULTING $50,000
DRAI HEALTH HARTWELL CAPITOL CONSULTING $50,000
VALTHOS INC. INVARIANT LLC $40,000
SANDY BAY PARTNERS, LLC GRACE BAY STRATEGIES, LLC $20,000
ORGANOGENESIS DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $15,000
ANTENNA RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $15,000
NETSCOUT DONOVAN STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
ALLLIANCE OF MARINE MAMMAL PARKS AND AQUARIUMS MEA STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
REGIONAL FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT GROUP COALITION ALL OF THE ABOVE CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
JACKSON WALKER LLP ON BEHALF OF SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
ANTHEIA INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
RAILROAD INVESTIGATION PROJECT GROUP EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC undisclosed
EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC EAGLE 1 RESOURCES, LCC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding John Hoeven, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $960,000,000
Individuals: $960,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $300,000,000
Individuals: $300,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us