S. 4954

S. 4954: A bill to declare that any person who enters the United States without authorization or for the purpose of engaging in birth tourism is considered an invader and to amend section 301(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to exclude the child

Introduced Jim Banks (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4954 is a bill that proposes to classify individuals who enter the United States without authorization or for the purpose of 'birth tourism' as 'invaders.' The bill also aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to specify that children born to such individuals would not automatically acquire U.S. citizenship.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4954 argue that the bill addresses concerns about illegal immigration and the perceived misuse of birthright citizenship. They believe it will help protect the integrity of U.S. borders and ensure that citizenship is granted only to those who enter the country legally.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4954 contend that the bill promotes xenophobia and undermines established legal principles regarding birthright citizenship. They argue that labeling individuals as 'invaders' dehumanizes them and could lead to increased discrimination against immigrant communities.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, indicating a low risk of conflicts of interest. The bill focuses on immigration policy, specifically targeting unauthorized entry and birth tourism, while the top donor industries for Jim Banks do not appear to have a vested interest in these issues. The lobbying activity related to this bill's policy area shows contributions from various organizations, but none are directly linked to the immigration sector, further supporting the low risk assessment. For example, contributions from Paramount Skydance Corporation and HealthEquity, Inc. do not correlate with immigration policy, as they are more aligned with entertainment and healthcare, respectively.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE TARPLIN, DOWNS & YOUNG, LLC $70,000
MATHEMATICA, INC TARPLIN, DOWNS & YOUNG, LLC $60,000
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM $60,000
PARAMOUNT SKYDANCE CORPORATION INNOVATIVE POLICY, PLLC $50,000
ACTUM ON BEHALF OF HEALTHEQUITY, INC. TARPLIN, DOWNS & YOUNG, LLC $50,000
COALITION FOR THE USE OF SAFE AND EFFICIENT REFRIGERANTS WILLIAMSON LAW + POLICY PLLC $20,000
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP $10,000
ASSOCIATION FOR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND PERFORMANCE (AMPP) ASSOCIATION FOR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND PERFORMANCE (AMPP) undisclosed
SYSTEMS & METHODS, INC. CAPROCK STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
HEALING LODGE OF THE SEVEN NATIONS HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
PUEBLO OF SANTA ANA HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
TIGERSWAN ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
LWRC INTERNATIONAL, LLC ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NATIVE VILLAGE OF EYAK HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jim Banks, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us