S. 5037

S. 5037: A bill to amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to make all children eligible for Medicaid from birth until age 26, to require States to automatically enroll children and young adults under age 26 in the State Medicaid program, and for othe

Introduced Andy Kim (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 5037 is a bill that seeks to amend the Social Security Act to ensure that all children are eligible for Medicaid from birth until they turn 26 years old. The bill also mandates that states automatically enroll children and young adults under the age of 26 into their Medicaid programs, simplifying access to healthcare for this age group.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 5037 argue that the bill would significantly improve healthcare access for millions of children and young adults, reducing the number of uninsured individuals in this age group. Many advocates believe that automatic enrollment will streamline the process, ensuring that families do not miss out on essential health services due to bureaucratic hurdles.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 5037 express concerns about the potential financial burden on state budgets, arguing that automatic enrollment could lead to increased costs and strain on Medicaid resources. Some opponents also worry that the expansion could result in lower quality of care or longer wait times for services as the system adapts to a larger number of enrollees.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of bill S. 5037, which aims to expand Medicaid eligibility for children and young adults, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Andy Kim's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area primarily involves organizations such as the American Library Association and various corporations, including CorMedix Inc., which contributed $220,000. However, these contributions do not directly relate to the healthcare or Medicaid sectors. The absence of significant financial ties between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's donors suggests that potential conflicts of interest are minimal. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not appear to influence this specific legislation significantly.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CORMEDIX INC. CORMEDIX INC. $220,000
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE $180,000
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $70,000
TERRANOVA INC FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
POSEIDON AEROSPACE FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
OBSIDIA SEMICONDUCTORS FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
SAALEX CORPORATION FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
HERTHA METALS FRONTERA GROUP $15,000
MN8 ENERGY LLC MN8 ENERGY LLC $15,000
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION A LEARNED HAND, LLC $10,860
RISK AND INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SOCIETY MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $10,000
VERMONT CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $8,000
AMERICAN TRAILER MANUFACTURERS COALITION WILEY REIN LLP undisclosed
UNCAC COALITION UNCAC COALITION undisclosed
CFA INSTITUTE CFA INSTITUTE undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us