S.J.Res. 197

S.J.Res. 197: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to “Pat

Introduced Tammy Baldwin (D) SENATE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S.J.Res. 197 is a joint resolution that seeks to disapprove a rule proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) related to the Medicare program. The resolution is a formal legislative action that allows Congress to reject the rule, which may involve changes to policies or regulations affecting Medicare services.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S.J.Res. 197 argue that disapproving the CMS rule is necessary to protect Medicare beneficiaries from potential negative impacts, ensuring that patients continue to receive quality care without new restrictions. Advocates emphasize the importance of congressional oversight in health care regulations.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S.J.Res. 197 contend that disapproving the CMS rule could hinder efforts to improve Medicare services and may lead to increased costs or reduced access to care. Some media outlets express concern that this resolution reflects a broader trend of undermining health care reforms aimed at benefiting seniors.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of S.J.Res. 197, sponsored by Tammy Baldwin, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter concerning the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. While there is significant lobbying activity in the healthcare policy area, the contributions from donors such as BYD Motors, LLC and Quectel Wireless Solutions do not directly relate to healthcare, indicating a low risk of conflict. The total lobbying amounts from known entities do not suggest a strong financial influence on the bill's direction, as the majority of lobbying activities are undisclosed. Voters should be aware that while there are financial interests at play, they do not appear to align closely with the bill's intent.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $140,000
QUECTEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO., LTD. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $90,000
CONNECTIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS MCDERMOTT+ LLC $60,000
CAMBER HEALTH MCDERMOTT+ LLC $50,000
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF WINEGRAPE GROWERS TORREY ADVISORY GROUP (FORMERLY MICHAEL TORREY ASSOCIATES, LLC) $50,000
BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES $20,000
PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC $20,000
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA - NUWEH MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
GREENPOWER BX LLC MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
CLARITY MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
ABRAWORKS LIMITED BURRELL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC undisclosed
THE PARTNERSHIP TO ADVANCE VIRTUAL CARE (PAVC) MCDERMOTT+ LLC undisclosed
MBDA INCORPORATED MBDA INCORPORATED undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us