S.Res. 701

S.Res. 701: A resolution designating the week of April 20 through 26, 2026, as “National Dark Sky Week”.

Agreed To (Simple Resolution) Catherine Cortez Masto (D) SENATE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S.Res. 701 is a bipartisan resolution passed by the U.S. Senate that designates the week of April 20 through 26, 2026, as 'National Dark Sky Week.' This resolution aims to raise awareness about light pollution and promote the preservation of dark skies for activities like stargazing. It encourages individuals and communities to reduce unnecessary artificial lighting during this week to appreciate the natural night sky.

Positive Media Summary

The resolution has received positive attention for highlighting the importance of dark sky preservation. For instance, Senator Catherine Cortez Masto emphasized that dark sky places, such as Nevada's Great Basin National Park, offer ideal destinations for stargazers seeking clear views of constellations and the Milky Way. Similarly, Senator Mark Kelly noted that Arizona, home to Flagstaff—the world's first International Dark Sky City—provides some of the best night sky views in the country. These statements underscore the resolution's role in promoting awareness and conservation of natural night skies.

Negative Media Summary

While the resolution has been generally well-received, some critiques have emerged regarding its effectiveness. Analyses suggest that while the resolution accurately identifies issues related to light pollution and encourages best practices, it lacks specific measurable targets or timelines for reducing light pollution. Additionally, there is limited empirical evidence that a one-week national observance alone can lead to sustained environmental improvements. These points highlight concerns about the resolution's potential impact without accompanying regulatory changes or funding.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Environmental Protection

Based on the available data, there appears to be no direct conflict of interest between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill, S.Res. 701, is focused on designating a week as 'National Dark Sky Week', which does not seem to have any direct implications for the Health Professionals or Retired individuals, who are the top donors to the sponsor, Catherine Cortez Masto. The total donations from these industries amount to $315,000,000, none of which overlap with the bill's subject matter. Furthermore, the lobbying activity in this bill's policy area does not indicate any significant financial influence from the sponsor's top donor industries.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
DZYNE TECHNOLOGIES CT GROUP FKA CTF GLOBAL LLC $60,000
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON CT GROUP FKA CTF GLOBAL LLC $45,000
SYSTEMATIC INC. CT GROUP FKA CTF GLOBAL LLC $45,000
COLLIER COLLECTIVE, LLC MCCOLL STRATEGIES LLC $40,000
IDAHO SCIENTIFIC CORP. CT GROUP FKA CTF GLOBAL LLC $40,000
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY CT GROUP FKA CTF GLOBAL LLC $40,000
XCIMER ENERGY CT GROUP FKA CTF GLOBAL LLC $30,000
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS USEC INC.) CT GROUP FKA CTF GLOBAL LLC $30,000
PIASECKI AIRCRAFT CORP. CT GROUP FKA CTF GLOBAL LLC $20,000
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP CT GROUP FKA CTF GLOBAL LLC $20,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND INC AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND INC $10,000
JAPANESE AMERICAN CONFINEMENT SITES CONSORTIUM SAKURA CONSERVATION STRATEGIES $10,000
340B HEALTH BASS BERRY & SIMS $10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND GLOBAL CAMPUS UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND GLOBAL CAMPUS, FORMERLY KNOWN AS UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE undisclosed
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL AVIATION ASSOCIATION NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL AVIATION ASSOCIATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Catherine Cortez Masto, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us