CA SB11

Artificial intelligence technology.

Vetoed Senate Angelique Ashby (D)
Plain English Summary

California Senate Bill 11 (SB11) aimed to regulate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly focusing on digital replicas. The bill required developers of AI tools capable of creating digital replicas to provide clear consumer warnings about the potential legal consequences of unauthorized use. Specifically, it mandated that these warnings be prominently displayed on all relevant pages and included in the terms and conditions. Non-compliance could result in civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day. The bill also clarified that the crime of false impersonation includes using digital replicas to impersonate someone else. However, the bill exempted digital replicas used solely within video games that are not distributed outside the game. Despite passing both legislative chambers unanimously, Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed the bill on October 13, 2025, and the veto was sustained on March 2, 2026.

Supporters Say

While specific media coverage of SB11 is limited, the bill's focus on consumer protection and legal clarity regarding AI-generated digital replicas was likely viewed positively by advocates for responsible AI development. The bill's provisions aimed to prevent misuse of AI technologies and protect individuals from unauthorized digital impersonation, aligning with broader efforts to establish ethical guidelines in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

Critics Say

Although direct media critiques of SB11 are scarce, potential concerns may have included the bill's impact on innovation and the AI industry's growth. Critics might have argued that the stringent requirements and substantial penalties could stifle technological advancement and place undue burdens on developers. Additionally, the exemption for video game applications might have been seen as inconsistent, potentially creating loopholes in the legislation.

Legislative Votes
Unfinished Business SB11 Ashby Concurrence
Senate · Sep 13, 2025
Passed
37
YEA
0
NAY
Unfinished Business SB11 Ashby Concurrence
Senate · Sep 12, 2025
Passed
37
YEA
0
NAY
SB 11 Ashby Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan
A · Sep 12, 2025
Passed
79
YEA
0
NAY
Do pass as amended
A · Aug 29, 2025
Passed
11
YEA
0
NAY
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
A · Jul 16, 2025
Passed
15
YEA
0
NAY
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]
A · Jul 1, 2025
Passed
9
YEA
0
NAY
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Public Safety]
A · Jun 17, 2025
Passed
11
YEA
0
NAY
Senate 3rd Reading SB11 Ashby
Senate · Jun 2, 2025
Passed
38
YEA
0
NAY
Do pass as amended
Senate · May 23, 2025
Passed
6
YEA
0
NAY
Placed on suspense file
Senate · May 5, 2025
Passed
7
YEA
0
NAY
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Senate · Apr 22, 2025
Passed
6
YEA
0
NAY
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Public Safety]
Senate · Apr 1, 2025
Passed
12
YEA
0
NAY

Source: LegiScan roll call vote data.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the California State Legislature. Conflict-of-interest analysis for this bill is coming soon.