CA SB318

Air pollution: stationary sources: best available control technology.

Failed Senate Josh Becker (D)
Plain English Summary

California SB318 aimed to improve air quality by updating regulations on air pollution from stationary sources, requiring the use of the best available control technology. The bill sought to amend various sections of the Health and Safety Code to enhance state efforts in managing air pollution. However, it ultimately did not pass.

Supporters Say

Supporters of SB318 would argue that the bill represented a significant step toward cleaner air and public health by mandating advanced pollution control technologies. They would emphasize the importance of California leading the way in environmental protection and setting a standard for other states to follow.

Critics Say

Critics of SB318 might contend that the bill imposed unnecessary regulations on businesses, potentially leading to economic burdens and job losses. They could argue that the requirements for best available control technology could be overly stringent and costly, hampering industry growth without delivering proportional environmental benefits.

Legislative Votes
Placed on suspense file
Senate · May 5, 2025
Passed
7
YEA
0
NAY
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Senate · Apr 23, 2025
Passed
5
YEA
3
NAY

Source: LegiScan roll call vote data.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the California State Legislature. Conflict-of-interest analysis for this bill is coming soon.