CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

Failed Senate Dave Cortese (D)
Plain English Summary

CA SB605 aimed to adjust the compensation for state attorneys and administrative law judges in California. The bill proposed changes to the Government Code to ensure that these public employees receive fair pay for their work. However, the bill ultimately did not pass.

Supporters Say

Supporters of CA SB605 would argue that the bill was essential for recognizing the hard work and dedication of state attorneys and administrative law judges. They would emphasize that fair compensation is crucial for attracting and retaining talented professionals in public service.

Critics Say

Critics of CA SB605 might contend that the proposed pay increases were unnecessary and could strain the state's budget. They would argue that public employees should not receive higher compensation without clear evidence of increased workload or performance.

Legislative Votes
Placed on suspense file
Senate · Apr 7, 2025
Passed
7
YEA
0
NAY
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
Senate · Mar 26, 2025
Passed
4
YEA
1
NAY

Source: LegiScan roll call vote data.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the California State Legislature. Conflict-of-interest analysis for this bill is coming soon.