Prohibits the use of intoxication of the victim as a defense in sex crimes where the victim is under the influence of any drug, intoxicant, or other substance to a degree which rendered the victim temporarily incapable of appraising or controlling such person's conduct and such condition was known or reasonably should have been known to a person in the actor's situation.

This bill makes it illegal for someone accused of a sex crime to use the victim's intoxication as a defense if the victim was unable to understand or control their actions due to drugs or alcohol. The law applies when the accused should have known about the victim's condition. Essentially, it aims to protect victims who may be incapacitated from being blamed for the assault.

Supporters of the bill argue that it strengthens protections for vulnerable individuals and ensures that perpetrators cannot evade responsibility by exploiting a victim's intoxication. They believe it sends a strong message that consent cannot be given when a person is incapacitated, reinforcing the importance of accountability in sexual assault cases.

Critics may argue that the bill could complicate legal defenses in sexual assault cases and potentially lead to wrongful accusations against individuals who believed consent was given. They may express concerns about the implications for due process and the ability of defendants to present their side of the story in court.