Removes from admissibility evidence that proves or tends to prove that a victim has been convicted of a prostitution offense within three years prior to the sex offense which is the subject of the prosecution.

This bill proposes to prevent evidence of a victim's past prostitution convictions from being used in court if those convictions occurred within three years before the sex offense being prosecuted. The aim is to protect victims from having their past criminal history used against them during legal proceedings related to sexual offenses. This change seeks to ensure that victims can come forward without fear of their past being used to discredit them.

Supporters of the bill argue that it is a crucial step in protecting victims of sexual offenses and ensuring they are not further victimized by the legal system. By removing such evidence from admissibility, the bill promotes a more compassionate approach to handling cases of sexual violence, encouraging victims to seek justice without the fear of being judged for their past.

Critics of the bill may argue that it limits the ability of the defense to present a full picture of the victim's character and past behavior. They might contend that allowing such evidence could provide context in cases where consent is in question, and that the bill could undermine the rights of the accused by restricting important evidence.