Authorizes a supreme court judge hearing a petition for an "extreme risk protection order" to also hear a petition for a regular order of protection pursuant to the criminal procedure law, the domestic relations law and/or the family court act.

This bill allows a supreme court judge to consider both an 'extreme risk protection order' and a regular order of protection at the same time. This means that when someone is asking for protection from potential harm, the judge can look at both types of requests in one hearing. This could streamline the process for individuals seeking safety in potentially dangerous situations.

Supporters of the bill argue that it enhances the ability of the courts to provide comprehensive protection for individuals at risk. By allowing judges to address multiple forms of protection in one proceeding, it could lead to more efficient and effective outcomes for those in need of safety from violence or threats.

Critics may contend that combining these two types of protection orders could overwhelm the judicial process and lead to rushed decisions. There are concerns that it might dilute the focus on the specific circumstances of each case, potentially compromising the effectiveness of the protection orders.