Provides that a court may require that a new election be held when there is clear and convincing evidence that the wrong candidate was determined to be the winner.

The bill allows a court to order a new election if there is strong evidence showing that the wrong candidate won an election. This means that if significant mistakes or issues are found in the election results, voters could have another chance to choose their representative. The goal is to ensure fairness and accuracy in the electoral process.

Supporters of the bill argue that it strengthens democracy by ensuring that every vote counts and that elections reflect the true will of the people. They believe it provides a necessary mechanism to correct electoral errors and uphold the integrity of the electoral system. This legislation empowers citizens and reinforces public trust in election outcomes.

Critics may argue that the bill could lead to unnecessary disruptions and uncertainty in the electoral process, potentially undermining confidence in election results. They might express concerns that the criteria for determining 'clear and convincing evidence' could be subjective, leading to potential misuse. Additionally, the possibility of repeated elections could strain resources and create confusion among voters.