Creates, in addition to the existing sanction of criminal contempt of court, the remedies of labor law civil penalties and employee's right to bring civil action for unlawful discharge, penalty or discrimination on account of the exercise by an employee of a juror's right to be absent from employment by reason of jury service.

This bill aims to strengthen protections for employees who serve on juries by allowing them to take legal action if they face discrimination, penalties, or wrongful termination due to their jury service. It introduces labor law civil penalties alongside existing criminal contempt sanctions for such violations. Essentially, it ensures that employees can exercise their right to serve on a jury without fear of losing their job or facing unfair treatment.

Supporters of this bill argue that it is essential for upholding the civic duty of jury service without jeopardizing an individual's employment. They believe that by providing legal remedies for wrongful treatment, the bill encourages more people to participate in the judicial process, thereby strengthening democracy and fairness in the legal system.

Critics might contend that this bill could lead to an increase in frivolous lawsuits against employers, potentially burdening businesses with unnecessary legal challenges. They may argue that the existing protections are sufficient and that the bill could create confusion regarding employee rights and employer responsibilities in the context of jury service.