Limits the circumstances under which the case of an adolescent offender may be removed to family court; limits the jurisdiction of family court with respect to certain repeat adolescent offenders.

This bill aims to restrict when cases involving adolescent offenders can be moved to family court. It also seeks to limit the family court's authority over certain repeat offenders, ensuring that more serious cases remain in the criminal justice system.

Supporters of the bill argue that it ensures accountability for repeat adolescent offenders by keeping them within the criminal justice system, which can provide more appropriate consequences for serious crimes. They believe this approach will help deter future offenses and maintain public safety.

Critics of the bill contend that it undermines the rehabilitative purpose of family court, which is designed to address the unique needs of young offenders. They worry that limiting family court jurisdiction could lead to harsher penalties and a lack of support for adolescents who may benefit from a more restorative approach.