Redefines culpability from not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect to responsible but for mental disease or defect; amends the procedures to be followed following a verdict or plea of responsible but for mental disease or defect; establishes maximum and minimum terms for persons sentenced upon such a verdict or plea.

This bill changes how the legal system views individuals who commit crimes but have mental health issues. Instead of being deemed 'not responsible' due to mental illness, they would be considered 'responsible but for' their mental condition. It also sets specific rules for sentencing these individuals, including minimum and maximum terms.

Supporters of this bill argue that it ensures accountability for individuals who commit crimes while also recognizing the impact of mental health on their actions. By establishing clear sentencing guidelines, the bill aims to balance justice with compassion, ensuring that those with mental health issues receive the necessary treatment and support.

Critics of the bill contend that it could lead to harsher punishments for individuals with mental health issues, undermining the principle of compassion in the justice system. They argue that redefining culpability in this way may stigmatize mental illness and deter individuals from seeking help for fear of legal repercussions.