TN HB0113

Testing Equipment Used To Determine The Presence Of A Synthetic Opioid

Passed House William Lamberth (R)
Plain English Summary

The bill makes a change to Tennessee law by permanently excluding certain narcotic testing equipment from being classified as drug paraphernalia. This means that as long as the testing equipment is not used for illegal drug activities, it won't be considered illegal. The previous expiration date for this exclusion has been removed, allowing it to remain in effect indefinitely.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that it is a necessary step to ensure that law enforcement and medical professionals can effectively identify synthetic opioids without fear of legal repercussions. They believe this will enhance public safety by allowing for better tracking and response to the opioid crisis.

Critics Say

Critics of the bill contend that making this exclusion permanent could inadvertently support the misuse of synthetic opioids by making it easier for individuals to possess testing equipment without accountability. They worry that this may hinder efforts to combat drug offenses and could lead to increased drug-related issues in communities.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Industry Overlap
100%
Personal Conflicts
1 found

The analysis of Representative William Lamberth's personal financial interests in relation to HB0113 reveals a low risk of conflict of interest. As an attorney and partner at a law firm, his professional background aligns with the legal sector, which may tangentially relate to the bill's focus on drug paraphernalia laws. However, there is no direct evidence that his legal practice or consulting business would financially benefit from the legislation concerning narcotic testing equipment. The bill primarily impacts the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, and there is no indication that Rep. Lamberth has financial stakes in these areas. Therefore, the potential for personal financial gain from the bill's enactment appears minimal.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Partner at Lamberth, Cifelli, Ellis & Nason, P.A. TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Lamberth Consulting AI-researched
Board Member Board Member of Sumner County CASA TN Legislature bio
Spouse Employer Spouse employed by Sumner County Schools AI-researched
Employer STATE OF TN Government TN Ethics Commission
Employer SELF EMPLOYED ATTORNEY Lawyers/Law Firms TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner PORTLAND COMMUNITY CHAIRMAN from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner UNITED WAY SUMNER CO BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current Education TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, GENERAL PRACTICE OF LAW TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, STATE OF TN TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: LAMBERTH PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.