TN HB0547

Public Safety

Passed House Mark Cochran (R)
Plain English Summary

Tennessee HB0547 requires courts to add a $12.50 fee to every criminal case, which will go to county governments. This money is intended to support public safety services as decided by the district attorney general. The law will take effect if approved by a two-thirds vote from the county legislative body and mandates annual reports from the district attorneys receiving the funds.

Supporters Say

Supporters of HB0547 argue that the new fee will provide essential funding for public safety initiatives in local communities. They believe it empowers district attorneys to address safety concerns effectively and enhances the overall security of neighborhoods. This approach is seen as a proactive measure to reduce crime and improve community well-being.

Critics Say

Critics of HB0547 contend that adding a fee to criminal cases could disproportionately burden low-income defendants and their families. They argue that it may create additional financial strain on individuals already facing legal challenges. Furthermore, there are concerns about the lack of oversight on how the funds are used, potentially leading to mismanagement or ineffective spending.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
3/10
Risk Level
Medium
Policy Area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
2 found

The sponsor of HB0547, Mark Cochran, is an attorney and owner of Cochran Law. The bill mandates a $12.50 charge in criminal court cost bills to fund public safety services at the discretion of the district attorney general. While this bill primarily affects public safety funding and court operations, there is a potential indirect connection to the legal field, as attorneys often interact with court systems and may have an interest in how court-related fees are structured. However, the bill does not directly benefit Cochran Law or the legal profession financially, as the funds are directed to county governments and district attorneys, not private legal practices. Thus, the connection between Cochran's role as an attorney and the bill's impact is indirect and not likely to result in significant personal financial gain.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Attorney at Cochran Law Lawyers/Law Firms TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Cochran Law TN Legislature bio
Employer COCHRAN FAMILY FARM TN Ethics Commission
Employer MCMINN COUNTY GOVERNMENT TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP OF ENGLEWOOD CHAIRMAN from Feb 2011 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner MCMINN COUNTY SENIOR CENTER BOARD MEMBER from Oct 2010 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner KEEP MCMINN BEAUTIFUL BOARD MEMBER from Oct 2010 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner ENGLEWOOD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEE from Jan 2018 to current TN Ethics Commission
Asset EDWARD JONES TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: DELEGATION PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.