TN HB0761

The Protect Tennessee Minors Act

Passed House Mary Littleton (R)
Plain English Summary

The bill amends the Protect Tennessee Minors Act by removing the definition of 'content harmful to minors.' This change simplifies the legislation by eliminating specific criteria for what constitutes harmful content. As a result, it may affect how such content is regulated in relation to minors in Tennessee.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that removing the definition of harmful content allows for more flexibility in addressing issues related to minors and online content. They believe it can help protect the rights of parents to make decisions regarding their children's exposure to various types of media without being constrained by rigid definitions.

Critics Say

Critics contend that eliminating the definition of 'content harmful to minors' could lead to increased exposure of minors to inappropriate material. They argue that this change undermines protections for children and may make it more difficult to regulate harmful content effectively.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Civil Rights and Liberties
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The analysis of Representative Mary Littleton's personal financial interests reveals no direct conflicts of interest with the subject matter of HB0761. The bill focuses on amending definitions related to content harmful to minors, primarily affecting areas such as social media and data privacy. Representative Littleton's financial interests, including ownership of Littleton Ranch and assets in RAYMOND JAMES, PRINCIPAL, and TRADITIONS FIRST BANK, do not have a direct connection to the legislative subjects of the bill. Her primary occupation as a legislator and her business ownership in agriculture do not intersect with the civil rights and liberties or technology sectors impacted by this bill. Therefore, there is no apparent financial gain for Representative Littleton from the enactment of this legislation.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Legislator TN Legislature bio
Employer Tennessee House of Representatives AI-researched
Business Owner Owner of Littleton Ranch AI-researched
Spouse Employer Owner of Littleton Ranch AI-researched
Asset RAYMOND JAMES TN Ethics Commission
Asset PRINCIPAL TN Ethics Commission
Asset TRADITIONS FIRST BANK TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.