TN HB0809

Pesticides

Introduced House Rusty Grills (R)
Plain English Summary

This bill states that if a pesticide is registered and has a label approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) when it is sold, the manufacturer or seller cannot be held responsible in court for any issues related to that label. This means they would not face civil lawsuits regarding the labeling of their pesticides, as long as they followed federal guidelines.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that it encourages innovation and the use of safe pesticides by providing legal protections for manufacturers and sellers. They believe this will lead to more effective pest control solutions for farmers and consumers, ultimately benefiting agriculture and public health.

Critics Say

Critics of the bill contend that it reduces accountability for pesticide manufacturers and could lead to public safety risks. They worry that it may allow harmful products to remain on the market without proper oversight, potentially endangering both the environment and human health.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
8/10
Risk Level
High
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food
Industry Overlap
33%
Personal Conflicts
1 found

The sponsor of HB0809, Rusty Grills, has a direct personal financial interest in the agricultural sector, specifically in crop production, as he is a farmer and owner of Grills Farms. This bill seeks to limit the liability of pesticide manufacturers and sellers regarding labeling, provided the labels are EPA-approved. As a farmer, Grills may benefit from reduced costs or increased availability of pesticides, as manufacturers and sellers might pass on savings from reduced liability risks to their agricultural customers. This direct alignment between his occupation and the bill's impact on the agricultural industry suggests a significant potential for personal financial gain. Additionally, the bill's focus on tort reform within the agricultural sector could further benefit his farming operations by potentially lowering operational risks and costs associated with pesticide use.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Farmer Crop Production AI-researched
Business Owner Owner of Grills Farms TN Legislature bio
Employer RCHJ LLC TN Ethics Commission
Spouse Employer CAPE SURGERY CENTER TN Ethics Commission
Employer FARMER SELF EMPLOYED FARMER TN Ethics Commission
Asset FIDELITY Securities & Investment TN Ethics Commission
Asset EDWARD JONESand Minor Child TN Ethics Commission
Asset FARM BUREAU STOCK TN Ethics Commission
Asset CHARLES SCHWAB Securities & Investment TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: G-PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.