TN HB1179

Insurance Benefits For Pharmacy

Introduced House Monty Fritts (R)
Plain English Summary

This bill proposes to extend the notice period required before an initial on-site audit of a pharmacy from two weeks to three weeks. The notice must be given by any covered entity, such as a pharmacy benefits manager or state agency, to the pharmacist or pharmacy involved.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that it provides pharmacists and pharmacies with more time to prepare for audits, ensuring they can gather necessary documentation and comply with audit requirements. This additional time can help pharmacies maintain better operational efficiency and accuracy.

Critics Say

Critics of the bill may claim that extending the notice period for audits could delay the identification of issues within pharmacies, potentially allowing discrepancies or inefficiencies to persist longer. They might also argue that it adds unnecessary procedural delays in the auditing process.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Health
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The analysis of HB1179 reveals no significant conflicts of interest between Representative Monty Fritts' personal financial interests and the bill's subject matter. The bill focuses on extending the notice period for audits of pharmacists and pharmacies, which primarily impacts the pharmaceutical and health insurance industries. Representative Fritts' personal financial interests are primarily in real estate, government pensions, and education, with no direct ties to the pharmaceutical or health insurance sectors.

His role as a real estate broker and co-owner of a real estate business does not intersect with the legislative changes proposed in HB1179. Additionally, his involvement with the Roane State Community College EMT Advisory Board and the American Legion Post 50 are unrelated to the bill's focus on pharmacy audits. Therefore, there is no evidence to suggest that Representative Fritts would gain financially from the passage of this bill.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Retired Law Enforcement Officer Retired AI-researched
Employer Tennessee State Representative TN Legislature bio
Employer COVENANT BROKER REAL ESTATE Real Estate TN Ethics Commission
Employer Y12 NSC PENSION TN Ethics Commission
Employer STATE OF TN Government TN Ethics Commission
Employer VETERANS ADMIN/AFFAIRS TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner ROANE STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EMT ADVISORY BOARD BOARD MEMBER from Nov 2023 to current Education TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner COVENANT BROKER REAL ESTATE REALTOR/CO-OWNER from Oct 2010 to current Real Estate TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner AMERICAN LEGION POST 50 ADJUTANT from Jun 2023 to current TN Ethics Commission
Asset REGIONS BANK TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Other, REAL ESTATE BROKERand Spouse Real Estate TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.