TN HB1311

Health Related Licensure

Passed House William Lamberth (R)
Plain English Summary

The bill simplifies the process for issuing licenses by removing the requirement for board member signatures. It allows health boards to form smaller groups to handle hearings and disciplinary matters. Additionally, it mandates that providers must share patient billing records when requested and clarifies how identifying information in disciplinary cases is handled.

Supporters Say

Supporters would argue that this bill streamlines the licensing process, making it more efficient and responsive to the needs of health care providers. By allowing boards to operate in panels, it can expedite hearings and improve the handling of disciplinary matters, ultimately benefiting patient care.

Critics Say

Critics may contend that removing the signature requirement undermines accountability and oversight within health boards. They might also express concerns that allowing panels to handle serious disciplinary issues could lead to inconsistent outcomes and a lack of transparency in the process.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Health
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The analysis of Representative William Lamberth's personal financial interests reveals no direct conflicts with the subject matter of HB1311. The bill pertains to health-related licensure and regulatory procedures, while Lamberth's professional background is primarily in law, with no documented involvement in the healthcare industry. His roles as an attorney and partner at a law firm, as well as his other business and board affiliations, do not intersect with the healthcare licensure or regulatory processes addressed by the bill. Additionally, there is no evidence of ownership or investment in healthcare facilities, medical practices, or related industries that would benefit from the bill's provisions. The absence of direct or indirect financial interests in the healthcare sector suggests a low risk of conflict.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Partner at Lamberth, Cifelli, Ellis & Nason, P.A. TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Lamberth Consulting AI-researched
Board Member Board Member of Sumner County CASA TN Legislature bio
Spouse Employer Spouse employed by Sumner County Schools AI-researched
Employer STATE OF TN Government TN Ethics Commission
Employer SELF EMPLOYED ATTORNEY Lawyers/Law Firms TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner PORTLAND COMMUNITY CHAIRMAN from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner UNITED WAY SUMNER CO BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current Education TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, GENERAL PRACTICE OF LAW TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, STATE OF TN TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: LAMBERTH PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.