TN HB1313

Occupational Safety And Health Penalties

Introduced House William Lamberth (R)
Plain English Summary

Tennessee HB1313 proposes to change the maximum penalties for employers who violate the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Instead of fixed amounts of $7,000 for each violation and $70,000 for willful violations, the bill would allow penalties to match the maximum amounts set by federal occupational safety regulations.

Supporters Say

Supporters of HB1313 argue that aligning state penalties with federal standards will ensure stricter enforcement of workplace safety regulations. They believe this change will enhance worker protection and encourage employers to prioritize safety in their operations.

Critics Say

Critics of HB1313 contend that increasing penalties could disproportionately burden small businesses, potentially leading to job losses and reduced economic activity. They worry that the bill may create an overly punitive environment for employers rather than fostering cooperation on safety improvements.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Labor and Employment
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

Representative William Lamberth's personal financial interests do not appear to directly align with the impacts of HB1313, which seeks to amend penalties related to occupational safety and health. His primary occupation as an attorney and his role as a partner at a law firm do not directly intersect with the industries affected by this bill, which focuses on labor and employment, specifically worker safety. While attorneys may occasionally handle cases related to occupational safety, there is no indication that Lamberth's legal practice specializes in this area or that he stands to gain financially from changes to state occupational safety penalties. Additionally, his other roles, such as board memberships and his spouse's employment, do not present a conflict as they are unrelated to the bill's focus.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Partner at Lamberth, Cifelli, Ellis & Nason, P.A. TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Lamberth Consulting AI-researched
Board Member Board Member of Sumner County CASA TN Legislature bio
Spouse Employer Spouse employed by Sumner County Schools AI-researched
Employer STATE OF TN Government TN Ethics Commission
Employer SELF EMPLOYED ATTORNEY Lawyers/Law Firms TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner PORTLAND COMMUNITY CHAIRMAN from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner UNITED WAY SUMNER CO BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current Education TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, GENERAL PRACTICE OF LAW TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, STATE OF TN TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: LAMBERTH PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.