TN HB1626

Bondsmen

Introduced House William Lamberth (R)
Plain English Summary

The bill requires bondsmen and court clerks in Tennessee to submit their quarterly reports about the number of bonds issued and accepted, respectively, by the thirtieth day of January, April, July, and October, instead of the previous deadline of the twenty-fifth. This change aims to standardize the reporting timeline for better oversight.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill would argue that it enhances accountability by ensuring that bondsmen and court clerks provide timely and consistent data on bond activities. This increased transparency can help improve the overall integrity of the bail system in Tennessee.

Critics Say

Critics may contend that this bill places unnecessary administrative burdens on bondsmen and court clerks, potentially complicating their operations. They might argue that the previous deadlines were sufficient and that this change does not address more pressing issues within the bail system.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
3/10
Risk Level
Medium
Policy Area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Industry Overlap
33%
Personal Conflicts
2 found

The sponsor of HB1626, William Lamberth, is an attorney and a partner at a law firm, which places him within the legal industry that could be indirectly affected by changes to regulations concerning bondsmen. The bill itself modifies reporting deadlines for bondsmen and court clerks, which may have some peripheral impact on the legal sector, particularly in how attorneys interact with bondsmen and the court system. However, the bill does not directly alter the financial operations or profitability of law firms or attorneys. The connection between Lamberth's role as an attorney and the bill's focus on procedural adjustments for bondsmen is indirect, as it does not directly influence legal practice or income. Thus, while there is a sectoral alignment, the potential for personal financial gain is limited.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Partner at Lamberth, Cifelli, Ellis & Nason, P.A. TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Lamberth Consulting AI-researched
Board Member Board Member of Sumner County CASA TN Legislature bio
Spouse Employer Spouse employed by Sumner County Schools AI-researched
Employer STATE OF TN Government TN Ethics Commission
Employer SELF EMPLOYED ATTORNEY Lawyers/Law Firms TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner PORTLAND COMMUNITY CHAIRMAN from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner UNITED WAY SUMNER CO BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current Education TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, GENERAL PRACTICE OF LAW TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, STATE OF TN TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: LAMBERTH PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.