TN HB1640

Confidentiality Of Department Of Safety Records

Passed House William Lamberth (R)
Plain English Summary

Tennessee HB1640 makes certain records from the office of homeland security, specifically those related to critical infrastructure, confidential. This means that these records will not be available for public viewing or requests. The bill aims to enhance security by protecting sensitive information from being disclosed.

Supporters Say

Supporters of HB1640 argue that the bill is essential for national security, as it protects vital infrastructure information from potential threats. They believe keeping these records confidential will help prevent terrorist attacks and safeguard citizens by ensuring that sensitive data does not fall into the wrong hands.

Critics Say

Critics of HB1640 contend that the bill undermines transparency and accountability by restricting public access to important government records. They argue that such confidentiality may hinder public oversight and raise concerns about the potential for government overreach and lack of scrutiny over security practices.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The analysis of Representative William Lamberth's personal financial interests in relation to HB1640 reveals a low risk of conflict of interest. The bill focuses on the confidentiality of records related to critical infrastructure, which falls under the policy area of armed forces and national security, specifically touching on cybersecurity, data privacy, and intelligence activities. Representative Lamberth's professional background as an attorney and his roles in law firms and consulting do not directly intersect with the bill's focus on national security or infrastructure confidentiality. His involvement in legal practice and community organizations does not suggest any direct financial benefit from the passage of this bill. Furthermore, there is no evidence that his legal practice or consulting work involves matters related to cybersecurity or data privacy, which are central to the bill's provisions.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Partner at Lamberth, Cifelli, Ellis & Nason, P.A. TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Lamberth Consulting AI-researched
Board Member Board Member of Sumner County CASA TN Legislature bio
Spouse Employer Spouse employed by Sumner County Schools AI-researched
Employer STATE OF TN Government TN Ethics Commission
Employer SELF EMPLOYED ATTORNEY Lawyers/Law Firms TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner PORTLAND COMMUNITY CHAIRMAN from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner UNITED WAY SUMNER CO BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current Education TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, GENERAL PRACTICE OF LAW TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, STATE OF TN TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: LAMBERTH PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.