TN HB1852

Health

Failed House Monty Fritts (R)
Plain English Summary

The Tennessee HB1852 bill aimed to create the 'Tennessee mRNA Pharmaceutical Sovereignty and Safety Act,' which would have banned anyone, including healthcare professionals, from giving any vaccine or injectable solution that contains mRNA technology. The bill sought to regulate the use of mRNA vaccines in the state. However, it ultimately failed to pass.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill would argue that it was a necessary step to protect individual rights and ensure safety by preventing the administration of mRNA vaccines, which they believe may pose unknown risks. They would frame the legislation as a proactive measure to promote medical freedom and parental choice in healthcare decisions.

Critics Say

Critics of the bill would contend that it undermines public health efforts and could endanger the community by restricting access to vaccines that are proven to be safe and effective. They would argue that the legislation reflects misinformation about mRNA technology and could lead to increased vaccine hesitancy during health crises.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Health
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The analysis of Representative Monty Fritts' personal financial interests reveals no direct conflicts of interest with the proposed HB1852 bill. The bill focuses on prohibiting the administration of mRNA vaccines, which primarily affects the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries. Representative Fritts' financial interests are predominantly in real estate and government-related positions, with no documented ties to the healthcare or pharmaceutical sectors. His roles as a real estate broker and co-owner of a real estate business do not intersect with the legislative subjects of drug safety or health care costs. Additionally, his involvement with the Roane State Community College EMT Advisory Board and the American Legion Post 50 does not present any apparent financial benefit from the bill's enactment.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Retired Law Enforcement Officer Retired AI-researched
Employer Tennessee State Representative TN Legislature bio
Employer COVENANT BROKER REAL ESTATE Real Estate TN Ethics Commission
Employer Y12 NSC PENSION TN Ethics Commission
Employer STATE OF TN Government TN Ethics Commission
Employer VETERANS ADMIN/AFFAIRS TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner ROANE STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EMT ADVISORY BOARD BOARD MEMBER from Nov 2023 to current Education TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner COVENANT BROKER REAL ESTATE REALTOR/CO-OWNER from Oct 2010 to current Real Estate TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner AMERICAN LEGION POST 50 ADJUTANT from Jun 2023 to current TN Ethics Commission
Asset REGIONS BANK TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Other, REAL ESTATE BROKERand Spouse Real Estate TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.