TN HB1900

Lifetime Orders Of Protection

Introduced House William Lamberth (R)
Plain English Summary

The bill allows individuals to request a lifetime order of protection against someone who has been convicted of specific offenses in other states. It specifies that the petition can be filed in the county where the accused lives or where the person seeking protection lives if the accused is not a resident of Tennessee.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that it enhances the safety of individuals by providing them with a legal means to protect themselves from potentially dangerous offenders, regardless of where those offenders were convicted. They believe this measure strengthens existing protections and ensures that victims have access to necessary legal recourse.

Critics Say

Critics of the bill may raise concerns about the potential for misuse of lifetime orders of protection, arguing that it could lead to unfair legal consequences for individuals who may not pose a real threat. They might also express worries about the burden it places on the legal system and the challenges of enforcing such orders across state lines.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
3/10
Risk Level
Medium
Policy Area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Industry Overlap
50%
Personal Conflicts
2 found

The potential conflict of interest for Representative William Lamberth primarily stems from his occupation as an attorney and his role as a self-employed attorney. The bill HB1900, which deals with lifetime orders of protection, intersects with legal processes and could potentially increase the demand for legal services in cases involving such orders. As a practicing attorney, Lamberth may indirectly benefit from an increased need for legal representation in these matters. However, the connection is not direct, as the bill does not specifically create new business for his law firm or legal practice. Additionally, his involvement with organizations like CASA and United Way does not appear to directly benefit from the bill's provisions.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Partner at Lamberth, Cifelli, Ellis & Nason, P.A. TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Lamberth Consulting AI-researched
Board Member Board Member of Sumner County CASA TN Legislature bio
Spouse Employer Spouse employed by Sumner County Schools AI-researched
Employer STATE OF TN Government TN Ethics Commission
Employer SELF EMPLOYED ATTORNEY Lawyers/Law Firms TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner PORTLAND COMMUNITY CHAIRMAN from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner UNITED WAY SUMNER CO BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current Education TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, GENERAL PRACTICE OF LAW TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, STATE OF TN TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: LAMBERTH PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.