TN HB1974

Safety

Passed House Mark White (R)
Plain English Summary

The bill requires schools to create a safety plan for students who have an order of protection against another student in the same school. This plan must involve the school principal and, when possible, the school safety team, along with input from the student's parent or guardian. Additionally, parents or guardians must inform the school within 48 hours if there are any changes to the protection order.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that it enhances student safety by ensuring that schools take proactive measures to protect students who are at risk. By involving parents and safety teams in the development of safety plans, the bill fosters a collaborative approach to safeguarding students in educational environments.

Critics Say

Critics of the bill may contend that it places an additional burden on school administrators and may not effectively address the root causes of student conflict. They might also argue that the requirement for parental notification could deter some families from seeking necessary protection for their children.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
3/10
Risk Level
Medium
Policy Area
Education
Industry Overlap
50%
Personal Conflicts
1 found

Representative Mark White's role as Director at Lipscomb University's College of Leadership and Public Policy presents a potential conflict of interest with HB1974. The bill pertains to student safety plans in public schools, which could indirectly relate to his professional focus on education policy and leadership. While Lipscomb University is a private institution, the policies and practices developed in public education can influence broader educational standards and practices, potentially impacting the university's strategic interests or educational philosophy. However, there is no direct financial gain for Representative White from the enactment of this bill, as it primarily affects public school procedures rather than private educational institutions. The connection is indirect, as it pertains to his professional role in education policy rather than a direct financial benefit.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Educator TN Legislature bio
Employer Former Director of Admissions at a private school AI-researched
Board Member Member of the Tennessee House Education Administration Committee TN Legislature bio
Spouse Employer KATHY WHITE TN Ethics Commission
Spouse Employer FEDEX PENSION RETIREMENT Misc Transport TN Ethics Commission
Spouse Employer AECO PENSION PLAN TN Ethics Commission
Employer SOCIAL SECURITY AGENCY TN Ethics Commission
Employer LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY-DIRECTOR, COLLEGE OF LEADERSHP AND PUBLIC POLICY Education TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner GLOBAL CHILDREN'S EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION TRUSTEE from Jan 2005 to Dec 2018 TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: EDUCATE TENNESSEE PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.