TN HB2016

Employment-related Mental Health Evaluations

Introduced House Mark Cochran (R)
Plain English Summary

Tennessee HB2016 requires employers to allow employees or job applicants to access the results of any mental health evaluations they undergo as a condition of employment. If an employer denies this access, the employee or applicant can take legal action against them. The bill aims to promote transparency in the employment process regarding mental health evaluations.

Supporters Say

Supporters of HB2016 argue that the bill enhances employee rights by ensuring transparency and access to mental health evaluation results. This legislation is seen as a step towards reducing stigma around mental health in the workplace and empowering employees to understand their evaluations.

Critics Say

Critics of HB2016 may argue that the bill could lead to unnecessary legal disputes and complicate the hiring process for employers. They might express concern that providing access to mental health evaluation results could discourage individuals from applying for jobs or undermine the confidentiality of mental health assessments.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Labor and Employment
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The analysis of Representative Mark Cochran's personal financial interests in relation to HB2016 reveals a low risk of conflict of interest. The bill focuses on employment-related mental health evaluations, requiring employers to provide access to evaluation results and offering a private right of action for non-compliance. Representative Cochran's primary occupation as an attorney and owner of Cochran Law does not directly intersect with the mental health or employment evaluation industries. While his legal expertise may involve employment law, there is no indication that his law practice specializes in mental health evaluations or that he would financially benefit from the bill's passage. Additionally, his involvement in various community organizations and ownership of a family farm do not present any direct alignment with the bill's subject matter.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Attorney at Cochran Law Lawyers/Law Firms TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Cochran Law TN Legislature bio
Employer COCHRAN FAMILY FARM TN Ethics Commission
Employer MCMINN COUNTY GOVERNMENT TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP OF ENGLEWOOD CHAIRMAN from Feb 2011 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner MCMINN COUNTY SENIOR CENTER BOARD MEMBER from Oct 2010 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner KEEP MCMINN BEAUTIFUL BOARD MEMBER from Oct 2010 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner ENGLEWOOD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEE from Jan 2018 to current TN Ethics Commission
Asset EDWARD JONES TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: DELEGATION PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.