TN HB2017

The Authority Of The Tennessee Fish And Wildlife Commission To Proscribe The Manner And Means Of Taking Wildlife

Passed House Mark Cochran (R)
Plain English Summary

The bill clarifies that local governments in Tennessee cannot create their own rules about how wildlife can be hunted, including the use of firearms. Instead, all regulations regarding hunting methods must follow the guidelines set by the Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission. This ensures a consistent approach to wildlife management across the state.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that it streamlines hunting regulations and prevents confusion caused by differing local laws. They believe that having a single authority, the Fish and Wildlife Commission, overseeing hunting practices will enhance wildlife conservation efforts and promote a unified approach to outdoor recreation.

Critics Say

Critics of the bill may contend that it undermines local control and the ability of communities to address specific wildlife management issues in their areas. They argue that local governments should have the authority to establish regulations that reflect the unique needs and concerns of their residents regarding wildlife and hunting practices.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The analysis of Representative Mark Cochran's personal financial interests reveals no direct conflicts with the subject matter of HB2017. The bill pertains to the regulation of wildlife management and the discharge of firearms during lawful hunting, areas that do not intersect with Cochran's professional roles or business interests. His primary occupation as an attorney and ownership of Cochran Law do not suggest any direct financial benefit from the bill's provisions. Additionally, his involvement with local community organizations and the McMinn County Government does not present any apparent conflict with the bill's focus on wildlife regulation and firearms use. Therefore, the risk of a conflict of interest is low.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Attorney at Cochran Law Lawyers/Law Firms TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Cochran Law TN Legislature bio
Employer COCHRAN FAMILY FARM TN Ethics Commission
Employer MCMINN COUNTY GOVERNMENT TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP OF ENGLEWOOD CHAIRMAN from Feb 2011 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner MCMINN COUNTY SENIOR CENTER BOARD MEMBER from Oct 2010 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner KEEP MCMINN BEAUTIFUL BOARD MEMBER from Oct 2010 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner ENGLEWOOD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEE from Jan 2018 to current TN Ethics Commission
Asset EDWARD JONES TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: DELEGATION PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.