TN HB2018

Enforcement Of Immigration Laws

Passed House Mark Cochran (R)
Plain English Summary

The bill requires certain law enforcement agencies in Tennessee to agree to enforce federal immigration laws by accepting and honoring immigration detainers from federal authorities. This means that if federal officials request that someone be held for immigration purposes, local law enforcement must comply. The bill amends several sections of the Tennessee Code to formalize this requirement.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that it strengthens cooperation between state and federal authorities in enforcing immigration laws, enhancing public safety. They believe that by ensuring local law enforcement honors federal detainers, communities can better manage immigration-related issues and uphold the rule of law.

Critics Say

Critics contend that the bill may lead to racial profiling and undermine trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement. They argue that mandatory compliance with federal detainers could result in unjust detentions and negatively impact public safety by discouraging individuals from reporting crimes.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Immigration
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The analysis of Representative Mark Cochran's personal financial interests reveals no direct conflicts with the subject matter of HB2018, which pertains to the enforcement of immigration laws. Cochran's primary occupation as an attorney and owner of Cochran Law does not intersect with the enforcement of immigration laws or the operations of law enforcement agencies. His other roles, such as his involvement with the Cochran Family Farm, McMinn County Government, and various community boards, do not present any apparent financial benefit from the proposed legislation. The bill's focus on law enforcement procedures related to immigration detainers does not overlap with the legal services or agricultural industries in which Cochran is involved. Therefore, there is no indication that Cochran would gain financially from the bill's passage.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Attorney at Cochran Law Lawyers/Law Firms TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Cochran Law TN Legislature bio
Employer COCHRAN FAMILY FARM TN Ethics Commission
Employer MCMINN COUNTY GOVERNMENT TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP OF ENGLEWOOD CHAIRMAN from Feb 2011 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner MCMINN COUNTY SENIOR CENTER BOARD MEMBER from Oct 2010 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner KEEP MCMINN BEAUTIFUL BOARD MEMBER from Oct 2010 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner ENGLEWOOD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEE from Jan 2018 to current TN Ethics Commission
Asset EDWARD JONES TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: DELEGATION PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.