TN HB2019

Judicial Dissolution Of Nonprofit Corporations

Passed House Mark Cochran (R)
Plain English Summary

Tennessee HB2019 allows the attorney general to dissolve nonprofit corporations in specific counties where the corporation's main office is located. If the corporation doesn't have an office in Tennessee, the venue will be where its registered office is situated. This change aims to clarify the legal process for dissolving these organizations.

Supporters Say

Supporters of HB2019 argue that this bill streamlines the process for addressing problematic nonprofit corporations, ensuring that they can be dissolved efficiently in designated venues. This legislation is seen as a way to protect the public interest by allowing the attorney general to take necessary action against nonprofits that may not be fulfilling their missions.

Critics Say

Critics of HB2019 contend that the bill could lead to unnecessary legal actions against nonprofit organizations, potentially disrupting valuable community services. They argue that the changes may create confusion regarding jurisdiction and could unfairly target nonprofits without adequate justification.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
3/10
Risk Level
Medium
Policy Area
Government Operations and Politics
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The sponsor of HB2019, Mark Cochran, is an attorney and owner of Cochran Law. While the bill pertains to the judicial dissolution of nonprofit corporations, which is a legal process, there is no direct evidence that Cochran Law specifically handles such cases. However, as an attorney, Cochran may have a professional interest in the legal frameworks governing nonprofit corporations, which could indirectly benefit his practice by potentially increasing the demand for legal services related to nonprofit governance and dissolution. Furthermore, his involvement in various community organizations, while not directly related to the bill, suggests a general interest in nonprofit operations, which may align with the bill's subject matter.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Attorney at Cochran Law Lawyers/Law Firms TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Cochran Law TN Legislature bio
Employer COCHRAN FAMILY FARM TN Ethics Commission
Employer MCMINN COUNTY GOVERNMENT TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP OF ENGLEWOOD CHAIRMAN from Feb 2011 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner MCMINN COUNTY SENIOR CENTER BOARD MEMBER from Oct 2010 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner KEEP MCMINN BEAUTIFUL BOARD MEMBER from Oct 2010 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner ENGLEWOOD FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEE from Jan 2018 to current TN Ethics Commission
Asset EDWARD JONES TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: DELEGATION PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.