TN HB2140

Criminal Offenses Involving Theft

Passed House Jason Zachary (R)
Plain English Summary

Tennessee HB2140 updates laws regarding organized retail crime, which involves theft from stores. The bill aims to strengthen penalties and clarify definitions related to these crimes to help law enforcement address the issue more effectively. It amends existing legal codes related to theft and criminal offenses.

Supporters Say

Supporters of HB2140 believe the bill will significantly enhance the ability of law enforcement to combat organized retail crime, protecting businesses and consumers alike. They argue that by updating the laws, the state is taking a proactive stance against theft that harms the economy and public safety.

Critics Say

Critics of HB2140 may argue that the changes could lead to over-policing and disproportionately affect low-income individuals who may be caught up in broader definitions of theft. They might also express concern that the focus on organized retail crime could divert attention and resources away from other pressing criminal issues.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The analysis of Representative Jason Zachary's personal financial interests reveals no direct conflicts with the subject matter of HB2140, which pertains to organized retail theft and the creation of a related registry. Zachary's primary occupation is as a businessman and owner of Americomm, a company that does not appear to operate within the crime and law enforcement sector. His other affiliations, including board memberships and assets in financial institutions, do not intersect with the legislative focus on criminal offenses or law enforcement.

While Zachary holds various positions and investments, none are directly linked to the retail industry or law enforcement, which are the primary areas impacted by this bill. His involvement with organizations such as the Tennessee Valley Corridor and religious and community groups does not suggest any financial gain from the proposed legislation.

Overall, the absence of any direct or indirect financial interests in the retail or law enforcement sectors indicates a low risk of conflict of interest. The bill's focus on enhancing law enforcement capabilities and addressing organized retail crime does not align with Zachary's documented financial interests.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Businessman AI-researched
Employer Owner of Americomm AI-researched
Business Owner Owner of Americomm TN Legislature bio
Board Member Board Member of the Tennessee Valley Corridor TN Legislature bio
Employer ONECOMM TN Ethics Commission
Employer FIRST BAPTIST CONCORD TN Ethics Commission
Employer WINSHAPE FOUNDATION TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner FIRST BAPTIST CONCORD MODERATOR from Oct 2015 to Oct 2016 TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner VITAL FAMILIES BOARD MEMBER from Sep 2017 to Jan 2021 TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner FIRST BAPTIST CONCORD STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE MEMBER from Oct 2018 to Oct 2021 TN Ethics Commission
Asset REGIONS BANK TN Ethics Commission
Asset FIDELITY Securities & Investment TN Ethics Commission
Asset SCHWAB TN Ethics Commission
Asset ROBINHOOD TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: ZAC PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.