TN HB2217

Special Districts

Introduced House Ron Gant (R)
Plain English Summary

TN HB2217 is a bill that proposes to change the rules regarding the appointment of members to the board of directors for certain special districts. Specifically, it removes the option for speakers to appoint a senator or representative from a central business improvement district as of January 1, 1999, to serve as an ex officio member of the board. This change affects how leadership is structured in these districts.

Supporters Say

Supporters of TN HB2217 argue that this bill streamlines the appointment process for board members of special districts, ensuring that leadership is more directly accountable to current representatives. By eliminating outdated provisions, the bill is seen as a step toward modernizing governance and improving efficiency in local decision-making.

Critics Say

Critics of TN HB2217 contend that removing the ability to appoint a senator or representative to the board undermines the representation of local interests in special districts. They argue that this change could lead to a disconnect between the board and the communities they serve, potentially diminishing oversight and accountability.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Government Operations and Politics
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The bill HB2217 pertains to the governance structure of special districts, specifically removing a provision related to the appointment of board members in central business improvement districts. The sponsor, Ron Gant, has personal financial interests primarily in the insurance and investment sectors, with no documented direct involvement in real estate development or management of special districts. His roles as an insurance agent and owner of insurance-related businesses do not align with the legislative subjects of building construction, housing, or real estate. Therefore, there is no apparent direct financial gain for the sponsor from the passage of this bill. The absence of direct personal financial interests in the areas affected by the bill suggests a low risk of conflict of interest.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Insurance Agent AI-researched
Employer E.B. Gant Insurance Agency TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of E.B. Gant Insurance Agency TN Legislature bio
Employer BOYLE INVESTMENTS & INSURANCE TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner BOYLE INVESTMENTS & INSURANCE VICE PRESIDENT from Sep 2018 to Jan 2025 TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner BOYLE INSURANCE AGENCY PRESIDENT from Feb 2025 to current TN Ethics Commission
Asset AMERICAN FUNDS TN Ethics Commission
Asset AMERITRADE TN Ethics Commission
Asset AMC FUNDS VIII TN Ethics Commission
Asset THE TRUST COMPANY OF TN TN Ethics Commission
Asset FIDELITY INVESTMENTS Securities & Investment TN Ethics Commission
Asset SCHWAB INVESTMENTS TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.