TN HB2456

Data Centers

Failed House Justin Pearson (D)
Plain English Summary

Tennessee HB2456 aimed to require specific data centers to register with the state's Department of Revenue. It also sought to mandate that fuel suppliers and utility companies report their usage and rates to the department, allowing for the compilation and publication of this information. The bill ultimately did not pass.

Supporters Say

Supporters of HB2456 would argue that the bill was a necessary step toward greater transparency and accountability for data centers in Tennessee. By requiring registration and reporting, it would help the state better understand the energy and resource consumption of these facilities, potentially guiding future policy decisions and promoting sustainable practices.

Critics Say

Critics of HB2456 might contend that the bill imposed unnecessary regulations on data centers, which could hinder their growth and investment in Tennessee. They could argue that the additional reporting requirements would create an administrative burden for both the data centers and utility companies without providing significant benefits to the public.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Commerce, Communications, Technology
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The analysis of Representative Justin Pearson's personal financial interests reveals no direct conflicts with the subject matter of HB2456, which pertains to the regulation and reporting requirements of data centers in Tennessee. Representative Pearson's professional background and financial interests are primarily centered around community organizing, environmental advocacy, and education, as evidenced by his roles with Memphis Community Against Pollution, BOLD ALLIANCE, and the University of Illinois. These roles do not intersect with the data center industry or the utilities that serve them. Furthermore, there is no indication that Representative Pearson has any investments or business interests in data centers, telecommunications, or related utilities. Consequently, there is no apparent pathway for personal financial gain from the proposed legislation.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Community Organizer AI-researched
Employer Co-founder of Memphis Community Against Pollution TN Legislature bio
Board Member Board member of Memphis Community Against Pollution TN Legislature bio
Employer BOLD ALLIANCE TN Ethics Commission
Employer EQUATION CAMPAIGN TN Ethics Commission
Employer UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS Education TN Ethics Commission
Employer FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH, CAPITOL HILL TN Ethics Commission
Spouse Employer COMMITTEE TO ELECT JUSTIN J. PEARSON TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner MEMPHIS COMMUNITY AGAINST POLLUTION FOUNDER AND PRESIDENT from Jul 2021 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner EQUATION CAMPAIGN BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2024 to current TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: MOVEMENT FOR JUSTICE PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.