TN HJR0729

A RESOLUTION to propose an amendment to Article VII, Section 5 of the Constitution of Tennessee, to change the date of elections for judicial and other civil officers.

Introduced House William Lamberth (R)
Plain English Summary

The bill proposes changing the election date for judges and other civil officers in Tennessee from the first Thursday in August to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. This change aims to align these elections with the general election schedule, providing voters with a more streamlined voting experience. Property assessors would not be affected by this change.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that aligning judicial elections with the general election date will increase voter turnout and participation. They believe that having elections on the same day will simplify the voting process and encourage more citizens to engage in local governance.

Critics Say

Critics of the bill may argue that changing the election date could disrupt established voting patterns and confuse voters. They might express concerns that the move could diminish the focus on judicial elections, making them less visible and potentially impacting the selection of qualified candidates.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
5/10
Risk Level
Medium
Policy Area
Government Operations and Politics
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
2 found

William Lamberth, as the sponsor of HJR0729, has personal financial interests that could present a potential conflict of interest. His employment with the State of Tennessee aligns with the bill's impact on government operations, as the proposed amendment affects the timing of elections for judicial and civil officers, which could indirectly influence his role within the state government. Additionally, his position as a board member of Volunteer State Community College may also intersect with the bill's implications, as changes in election dates could affect the governance and administration of educational institutions in Tennessee. While these interests do not provide a direct financial benefit from the bill, they suggest a level of involvement in sectors that could be impacted by the legislation.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Attorney Lawyers/Law Firms AI-researched
Employer Partner at Lamberth, Cifelli, Ellis & Nason, P.A. TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of Lamberth Consulting AI-researched
Board Member Board Member of Sumner County CASA TN Legislature bio
Spouse Employer Spouse employed by Sumner County Schools AI-researched
Employer STATE OF TN Government TN Ethics Commission
Employer SELF EMPLOYED ATTORNEY Lawyers/Law Firms TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner PORTLAND COMMUNITY CHAIRMAN from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner UNITED WAY SUMNER CO BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner VOLUNTEER STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD MEMBER from Jan 2026 to current Education TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, GENERAL PRACTICE OF LAW TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, STATE OF TN TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: LAMBERTH PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.