TN SB1883

Contested Cases

Passed Senate Jack Johnson (R)
Plain English Summary

The bill changes rules for certain boards linked to the Department of Environment and Conservation. It prevents these boards from reviewing initial decisions made by administrative law judges, although parties can still appeal directly to the board. Additionally, it shortens the time frame for judges to issue initial orders from 180 days to 90 days after a contested case hearing.

Supporters Say

Supporters of the bill argue that it streamlines the administrative process, making it more efficient and timely for parties involved in contested cases. By reducing the waiting period for initial orders, the bill aims to expedite decision-making and reduce backlog in the system.

Critics Say

Critics contend that the bill undermines the checks and balances within the administrative process by limiting board review of judicial decisions. They argue that this could lead to less oversight and potentially unfair outcomes for parties involved in contested cases.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Personal Interests
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Policy Area
Environmental Protection
Industry Overlap
0%
Personal Conflicts
0 found

The bill SB1883 pertains to the administrative processes of contested cases related to environmental protection, specifically focusing on boards associated with the Department of Environment and Conservation. While the sponsor, Jack Johnson, has various personal financial interests, including roles in healthcare and real estate, there is no direct overlap with the environmental protection sector or the specific subjects of water quality and hazardous waste management addressed by the bill. His business interests primarily lie in healthcare services and consulting, which do not intersect with the legislative impacts of this bill.

Sponsor's Personal Financial Interests

Unlike federal analysis based on campaign donations, state analysis examines legislators' personal financial interests — their jobs, businesses, and investments.

Type Description Industry Source
Occupation Vice President of Client Relations at a healthcare company AI-researched
Employer CIGNA Healthcare Health Services/HMOs TN Legislature bio
Business Owner Owner of a small business consulting firm AI-researched
Spouse Employer Owner of Johnson & Associates, a real estate company Real Estate AI-researched
Employer LFGS, LLC TN Ethics Commission
Employer COPART, INC. TN Ethics Commission
Employer BROWNING OIL COMPANY, INC. TN Ethics Commission
Business Owner BRIGHTSTONE BOARD MEMBER from Sep 2020 to current TN Ethics Commission
Asset FIDELITY PURITAN FUND Securities & Investment TN Ethics Commission
Asset FIDELITY CONTRA FUND Securities & Investment TN Ethics Commission
Asset FIDELITY OTC FUND Securities & Investment TN Ethics Commission
Asset VIRTUS NFS LARGE CAP FUND TN Ethics Commission
Asset COLUMBIA SELECT MID CAP FUND TN Ethics Commission
Asset JANUS ENTERPRISE FUND TN Ethics Commission
Asset FRANKLIN SMALL CAP FUND TN Ethics Commission
Asset DFA INTERNATIONAL VALUE FUND TN Ethics Commission
Asset BROWN CAPITAL SMALL COMPANY FUND TN Ethics Commission
Asset VANGUARD TOTAL BOND MARKET FUND Securities & Investment TN Ethics Commission
Asset VANGUARD INSTITUTIONAL INDEX FUND Securities & Investment TN Ethics Commission
Asset FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL DISCOVERY FUND Securities & Investment TN Ethics Commission
Asset COPART, INC TN Ethics Commission
Asset DODGE AND COX INCOME FUND TN Ethics Commission
Occupation Law, JUDGE TN Ethics Commission
Asset Leadership PAC: JACK PAC TN Ethics Commission

Items marked "AI-researched" are generated from public sources but have not been independently verified. Verified data is sourced from official legislature websites and disclosure filings.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us

About This Analysis

This summary was generated using AI from the bill's official text and metadata. Data sourced from LegiScan and the Tennessee General Assembly. Conflict analysis examines the sponsor's personal financial interests for potential overlaps with the bill's subject matter.