The unauthorized entry, occupancy, sale, rental, lease, advertisement for sale, rental, or lease, or conveyance of real property, including the removal of certain unauthorized occupants of a dwelling; creating criminal offenses; increasing a criminal penalty; authorizing a fee

Texas House Bill 4467, introduced in 2025, aims to address issues related to unauthorized activities involving real estate. The bill proposes creating new criminal offenses for actions such as entering, occupying, selling, renting, leasing, advertising, or conveying real property without proper authorization. It also seeks to increase penalties for existing offenses and authorizes the collection of fees associated with these violations. Additionally, the bill provides a mechanism for property owners to request the removal of unauthorized occupants from their dwellings through a sworn complaint to the county sheriff, potentially bypassing lengthy eviction processes. However, it also grants individuals who are wrongfully removed the right to sue the property owner for reinstatement and monetary damages, including multiple times the fair rental value, along with court costs and attorney fees.

Supporters of HB 4467 argue that the bill strengthens property rights by providing property owners with more efficient tools to address unauthorized occupancy and fraudulent real estate activities. By introducing new criminal offenses and increasing penalties, the legislation is seen as a deterrent against property-related crimes. The provision allowing property owners to seek the removal of unauthorized occupants through a sworn complaint to the county sheriff is viewed as a means to expedite the process, reducing the time and financial burden associated with traditional eviction proceedings. Proponents believe these measures will enhance the integrity of real estate transactions and protect homeowners from fraud and unauthorized use of their properties.

Critics of HB 4467 express concerns that the bill could lead to potential abuses and unintended consequences. The expedited removal process, which allows property owners to have occupants removed based on a sworn complaint without a court hearing, raises fears about due process violations and the risk of wrongful evictions. Tenant advocacy groups worry that individuals could be displaced without adequate legal recourse, especially in cases where occupancy disputes are complex. Additionally, the creation of new criminal offenses and increased penalties may disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, including low-income individuals and those experiencing housing insecurity. Opponents argue that the bill may prioritize property rights over tenant protections, potentially exacerbating housing instability.