Urging all public universities in Texas to respond swiftly and decisively to any attempts to occupy or disrupt campus property.

Texas Senate Concurrent Resolution 36 (SCR36) is a formal statement from the Texas Legislature urging all public universities in the state to act quickly and decisively against any efforts to occupy or disrupt campus property. The resolution emphasizes the importance of maintaining public safety and order on campuses, especially in light of recent international events that have led to protests, some of which have turned violent. It calls for universities to coordinate with local and state law enforcement to ensure the safety of all individuals and the uninterrupted operation of university activities. Additionally, the resolution reaffirms the commitment to protecting constitutional rights of free speech and peaceful assembly while making it clear that unlawful actions, such as occupying or taking over property, will not be tolerated and will result in appropriate disciplinary and legal actions. Official copies of the resolution are to be forwarded to the governing boards of all public universities in Texas, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, and the office of the governor.

Supporters of SCR36 argue that the resolution is a necessary measure to ensure the safety and security of students, faculty, and staff on university campuses. They believe that by urging swift and decisive action against disruptive activities, the resolution helps maintain an environment conducive to learning and free from violence. Proponents also appreciate the resolution's emphasis on protecting constitutional rights of free speech and peaceful assembly, viewing it as a balanced approach that upholds both safety and civil liberties.

Critics of SCR36 contend that the resolution could be used to suppress legitimate student protests and stifle free expression on campus. They worry that the call for swift and decisive action against disruptions may lead to an overly aggressive response from university administrations and law enforcement, potentially infringing on students' rights to peaceful assembly and protest. Opponents also express concern that the resolution's broad language could be interpreted in ways that discourage activism and dissent, which are vital components of a healthy academic environment.