H.R. 10256

H.R. 10256: To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and certain mineral leasing laws to reform oil and gas royalty relief, and for other purposes.

Introduced Maxine Dexter (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

Summary coming soon. We're still gathering details on this bill.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage summary coming soon.

Negative Media Summary

Media coverage summary coming soon.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
Unknown

The analysis of H.R. 10256, which aims to reform oil and gas royalty relief, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Maxine Dexter's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. Dexter's top donor industries include Health Professionals, contributing $120 million, and Retired individuals, contributing $37.5 million. Since neither of these industries is directly related to oil and gas, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. The absence of PAC contributions further indicates a lack of organized political influence from industries that would benefit from the bill's provisions. Voters should be aware that while the financial backing is substantial, it does not stem from sectors that would gain from changes in energy policy, thus reducing the likelihood of conflicts.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Maxine Dexter, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us