H.R. 5505

H.R. 5505: Equal Campus Access Act of 2025

Reported by Committee Tim Walberg (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Equal Campus Access Act of 2025 is a proposed law that would require public colleges and universities to provide religious student organizations with the same access to campus facilities and official recognition as other student groups. If a school denies these rights to religious organizations because of their beliefs or practices, it would lose federal funding under the Higher Education Act.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the bill argue that it protects the rights of religious students to freely associate and practice their faith on campus. They believe it ensures that religious groups are treated fairly and equally, preventing discrimination based on religious beliefs.

Negative Media Summary

Critics contend that the bill could force public institutions to support organizations that may have exclusionary practices, potentially conflicting with the schools' non-discrimination policies. They worry it might compel universities to fund or recognize groups whose beliefs or practices are at odds with institutional values or policies promoting inclusivity.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of H.R. 5505: Equal Campus Access Act of 2025, sponsored by Tim Walberg, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. While there is significant lobbying activity from companies like Tencent America LLC and Alibaba Group Holding Limited, which have contributed $200,000 and $80,000 respectively through lobbying firms, these contributions do not directly relate to the bill's focus on campus access. The lack of direct financial ties between the sponsors' donors and the bill's provisions suggests a low risk of conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not necessarily indicate a conflict unless there is a clear financial incentive tied to the bill's outcomes.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA, LLC BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $200,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $80,000
B&H FOTO & ELECTRONICS CORP STONINGTON GLOBAL $75,000
CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. $60,000
NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC $10,000
SULLIVAN STRATEGIES OBO ODOT COLUMBIA STRATEGIC COUNSEL $10,000
ACT FOR AMERICA ACT FOR AMERICA $10,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
TENCENT AMERICA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
XTAR LLC THE MADISON GROUP undisclosed
ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK undisclosed
ARDMORE CONSULTING GROUP, INC BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP undisclosed
T-MOBILE USA, INC. ALPINE ADVISORS undisclosed
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. undisclosed
PLAYPOWER, INC. MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us