H.R. 8347

H.R. 8347: RURAL Healthcare Act

Reported by Committee Clarence Owens (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The RURAL Healthcare Act aims to improve healthcare access and services in rural areas of the United States. It likely includes provisions for increasing funding for rural healthcare facilities, expanding telehealth services, and addressing workforce shortages in these regions to ensure that residents have better access to medical care.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets have praised the RURAL Healthcare Act for its potential to bridge the healthcare gap in underserved rural communities. Advocates highlight that the bill could lead to better health outcomes and increased access to essential services, which is particularly important in light of the ongoing challenges faced by rural populations.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the RURAL Healthcare Act express concerns about the feasibility of its provisions and whether it will adequately address the complex issues facing rural healthcare. Some argue that the bill may not go far enough in addressing systemic problems and fear that it could lead to unequal distribution of resources among rural areas.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

The H.R. 8347: RURAL Healthcare Act does not show direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Clarence Owens' top donor industries, indicating a lower risk of conflicts of interest. While there is significant lobbying activity in the healthcare policy area, the disclosed amounts from specific organizations do not appear to directly influence the bill's provisions. For instance, the Marshfield Clinic Health System has contributed $60,000, and the Coalition for the Use of Safe and Efficient Refrigerants has contributed $20,000, but these contributions do not directly correlate to any specific provisions in the bill. The lack of direct donor industry overlap and the relatively low dollar amounts from lobbyists suggest that while there are interests at play, they may not pose a significant conflict for voters to be concerned about.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION NATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION $150,000
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM $60,000
SOUTHERN IONICS KEY IMPACT STRATEGIES $30,000
COALITION FOR THE USE OF SAFE AND EFFICIENT REFRIGERANTS WILLIAMSON LAW + POLICY PLLC $20,000
NATIONAL CONSUMER REPORTING ASSOCIATION NATIONAL CONSUMER REPORTING ASSOCIATION $5,000
HEALING LODGE OF THE SEVEN NATIONS HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
PUEBLO OF SANTA ANA HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
TIGERSWAN ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
LWRC INTERNATIONAL, LLC ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NATIVE VILLAGE OF EYAK HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION undisclosed
RMS OF GEORGIA, LLC D/B/A CHOICE REFRIGERANTS WILLIAMSON LAW + POLICY PLLC undisclosed
BRISTOL BAY AREA HEALTH CORP HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
COUNCIL OF ATHABASCAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us