H.R. 9527

H.R. 9527: To require the Office of Management and Budget to consider revising the Standard Occupational Classification system to establish a separate code for strength and conditioning coaches, and for other purposes.

Introduced Clarence Owens (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9527 is a bill that aims to direct the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to consider updating the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. The purpose of this update would be to create a distinct occupational code specifically for strength and conditioning coaches, recognizing their unique role in the workforce.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9527 have praised the bill for acknowledging the importance of strength and conditioning coaches in athletic and fitness environments. They argue that establishing a separate code will help legitimize the profession, improve job recognition, and potentially lead to better job opportunities and resources for professionals in this field.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9527 have raised concerns about the necessity of creating a separate occupational code for strength and conditioning coaches. Some argue that it may divert resources from more pressing workforce classification needs or that it could complicate the existing SOC system without providing significant benefits to the profession.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Sports and Recreation

The analysis of H.R. 9527, sponsored by Clarence Owens, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. As the bill pertains to the classification of strength and conditioning coaches, it does not intersect with any of the industries that financially support Owens. This lack of overlap suggests that there are no apparent conflicts of interest that could influence the legislative process. Voters can feel assured that the motivations behind this bill are not financially tainted by donor interests in related sectors.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Clarence Owens, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us