H.R. 8628

H.R. 8628: To repeal section 101(a)(15)(U) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for other purposes.

Introduced Chip Roy (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8628 aims to repeal a specific provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act that relates to certain nonimmigrant visa categories, particularly those that provide protections for victims of crime. This repeal could impact the legal status and protections available to individuals who qualify under this section.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8628 argue that repealing this section will streamline immigration processes and reduce potential abuse of the visa system, thereby enhancing national security and ensuring that resources are directed to those who follow legal immigration pathways.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8628 express concern that repealing this section could endanger vulnerable populations, particularly victims of crime who rely on this provision for legal protections and support. They argue that the bill undermines efforts to assist those in need and could lead to increased fear among immigrant communities.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
6/10
Risk Level
Medium
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The bill H.R. 8628, which seeks to repeal a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act, presents potential conflicts of interest for its sponsor, Chip Roy. His top donor industries include Health Professionals, contributing a significant $120 million, and Retired individuals, contributing $37.5 million. Notably, the Retired sector has a direct overlap with the bill's subject matter, as it received $37.5 million in donations from this industry. This raises questions about whether the interests of retired individuals, who may have specific views on immigration policies, are influencing the legislative agenda. The substantial financial support from these industries could suggest a prioritization of their interests in the legislative process, potentially at the expense of broader public interest in immigration reform.

Industry Overlap — Follow the Money

These industries are both affected by this bill and among the sponsor's top donors.

Industry Match Type Related Subject Donations
Retired (W06) Sector Immigration $37,500,000
Total from overlapping industries $37,500,000
Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
FRESENIUS KABI USA LLC FRESENIUS KABI USA LLC $1,100,000
CONSEJO COORDINADOR EMPRESARIAL IQOM STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC $140,000
IVANHOE ATLANTIC (FORMERLY HIGH POWER EXPLORATION INC.) YORKTOWN SOLUTIONS $120,000
SKYRYSE, INC. SKYRYSE, INC. $70,000
AIS HEALTHCARE MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $20,000
THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC FOR CAPE FEAR PUBLIC UTILITY AUTHORITY,NC EARL STOCKDALE undisclosed
THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC ON BEHALF OF WEST COUNTY WASTEWATER DISTRICT, CA EARL STOCKDALE undisclosed
THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC FOR CITY OF OCEANSIDE CA EARL STOCKDALE undisclosed
THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC ON BEHALF OF WARD & SMITH (FOR BALD HEAD ISLAND) EARL STOCKDALE undisclosed
THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC ON BEHALF OF WARD & SMITH, PA (FOR HOLDEN BEACH, NC) EARL STOCKDALE undisclosed
CORE POWER (US) INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
ICON TECHNOLOGY, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
HUBBS-SEAWORLD RESEARCH INSTITUTE HAMMER ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
THE POLICY SHOP LLC JAVELIN ADVISORS LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF HEALTHCARE PURCHASER COALITIONS NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF HEALTHCARE PURCHASER COALITIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Chip Roy, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us