H.R. 8828

H.R. 8828: To direct the Attorney General to establish an official station for the United States attorney for the Western District of Washington in the county of Clark, Washington, and for other purposes.

Introduced Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8828 is a bill that directs the Attorney General to establish an official office for the U.S. Attorney in Clark County, Washington, specifically for the Western District of Washington. This aims to enhance legal representation and services in that region.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8828 have praised the bill as a necessary step to improve access to justice and legal resources in Clark County. They argue that having a dedicated U.S. Attorney's office will help address local legal issues more effectively and support the community's needs.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8828 have raised concerns about the potential costs associated with establishing a new office, arguing that resources could be better allocated to existing offices or programs. Some have also questioned the necessity of an additional U.S. Attorney's office in the region, suggesting it may not significantly impact local legal proceedings.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

The analysis of H.R. 8828, which aims to establish a U.S. Attorney's office in Clark County, Washington, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and her top donor industries. The lobbying activity related to this bill shows various entities contributing to lobbying efforts, but these do not appear to directly influence the bill's subject matter. For instance, the County of Los Angeles contributed $20,000, but this does not indicate a direct conflict with the establishment of a federal office in Washington. The undisclosed amounts from other entities further complicate the analysis, but without clear connections to the bill's objectives, the risk remains low. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not currently suggest a significant conflict of interest for the sponsor.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SYNGENTA CORPORATION CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $140,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPRO NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPRO $85,660
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TORRES CONSULTING, LLC $20,000
CURIO CURIO $10,000
WILLOW LABORATORIES WILLOW LABORATORIES undisclosed
ECONOINVEST HOLDING LLC CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
FIELD TECH INTERNATIONAL CORP CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
SYNCHRON, INC. KING & SPALDING LLP undisclosed
GIFT-IN-KIND MARKETPLACE MICHAEL BEST STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
BROADBAND CONNECT B ARCHETYPE undisclosed
STELLAR DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION STELLAR DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION undisclosed
FONTAINEBLEAU DEVELOPMENT CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
CITY OF EL PASO FORWARD GLOBAL undisclosed
FOREST RIVER BUS, LLC CFM STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS (CONKLING FISKUM & MCCORMICK) undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL MINERALS CARLSBAD, LLC VALIANT STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us