H.R. 8972

H.R. 8972: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include optional practical training for F-1 visa holders as employment for purposes of taxes under the Federal Insurance Contribution Act and the Social Security Act.

Introduced Glenn Grothman (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8972 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to classify optional practical training (OPT) for F-1 visa holders as eligible employment for tax purposes. This means that income earned by F-1 visa holders during their OPT would be subject to the Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) taxes and Social Security contributions, allowing these individuals to contribute to social security and Medicare benefits.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8972 argue that the bill recognizes the contributions of F-1 visa holders to the U.S. economy and ensures they are treated equitably in the tax system. Advocates say this could lead to increased funding for social security and Medicare, benefiting the overall economy.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8972 express concern that taxing F-1 visa holders during their practical training could deter international students from pursuing opportunities in the U.S. They argue that this could negatively impact the attractiveness of U.S. educational institutions and lead to a decrease in skilled labor in the country.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 8972, which aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to include optional practical training for F-1 visa holders as employment for tax purposes, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the top donor industries of sponsor Glenn Grothman. His primary donor industries, Health Professionals ($240 million) and Retired ($75 million), do not have a clear connection to the immigration or tax implications of this bill. The lack of direct financial ties suggests that the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal. Furthermore, while there is lobbying activity related to tax reform and employment, it does not directly correlate with Grothman's donor base, indicating that the financial motivations behind this bill may not be influenced by his major contributors.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
REFORMING AMERICA'S TAXES EQUITABLY (RATE) SURROUND SOUND STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
SKYFRONT THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
SKYFRONT THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC undisclosed
ADNEURIS THERAPEUTICS, INC. MAD GLOBAL STRATEGY undisclosed
ALUCHEM INC. MAD GLOBAL STRATEGY undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
GPA MIDSTREAM ASSOCIATION SHUMAKER ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT DENNIS CARDOZA CONSULTING SERVICES undisclosed
INDUSTRIOUS GROUP INC. THORN RUN PARTNERS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Glenn Grothman, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us