H.R. 9515

H.R. 9515: To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to require the use of multi-factor authentication to access certain information through healthcare.gov.

Introduced Glenn Grothman (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9515 aims to amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act by requiring that multi-factor authentication be used to access certain information on healthcare.gov. This is intended to enhance security and protect users' personal information when they are accessing healthcare services online.

Positive Media Summary

The bill has been positively received for its focus on improving cybersecurity measures on healthcare.gov. Supporters argue that implementing multi-factor authentication will help safeguard sensitive health information, thereby increasing public trust in the online healthcare system.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill express concerns that the requirement for multi-factor authentication could create barriers to access for individuals who may not be tech-savvy or have limited access to the necessary technology. Some argue it could complicate the enrollment process for healthcare services.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 9515, which aims to amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act regarding multi-factor authentication for healthcare.gov, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Glenn Grothman's top donor industries. The primary lobbying activity in this policy area comes from various sectors, including healthcare and energy, with significant contributions from companies such as Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc. ($60,000) and Occidental Petroleum Corporation ($20,000). However, these contributions do not directly relate to the bill's focus on cybersecurity measures for healthcare access. Therefore, while there is lobbying activity in the healthcare sector, it does not present a clear conflict of interest for the sponsor based on the available data.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION ACTION INC ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Glenn Grothman, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us