H.R. 9081

H.R. 9081: To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to allow health marketplace pools to be deemed an employer under section 3(5) of such Act for purposes of offering a group health plan or group health insurance coverage, and for oth

Introduced Beth Van Duyne (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9081 aims to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to classify health marketplace pools as employers. This change would allow these pools to offer group health plans or group health insurance coverage, potentially increasing access to affordable health insurance options for individuals and small businesses.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9081 argue that this legislation could enhance access to health insurance by allowing more flexible options for individuals and small businesses. By enabling health marketplace pools to provide group coverage, the bill is seen as a step towards improving healthcare affordability and accessibility.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9081 express concerns that the bill may undermine existing regulations under ERISA, potentially leading to reduced protections for consumers. There are fears that allowing health marketplace pools to be classified as employers could create loopholes that might be exploited, resulting in lower quality health plans and increased costs for consumers.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 9081 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Beth Van Duyne's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter concerning health marketplace pools and group health plans. Although there is lobbying activity in this policy area, the contributions from entities like Summit Works USA ($20,000) and Monroe Energy, LLC ($10,000) do not indicate a direct financial interest in the specific provisions of the bill. The undisclosed amounts from other lobbying entities further complicate the assessment but do not provide concrete evidence of a conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while there are significant contributions from various organizations, these do not directly correlate with the legislative intent of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
SUMMIT WORKS USA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us