H.R. 9112

H.R. 9112: To provide visuals artists the exclusive right to authorize the commercial exploitation, or public distribution in or affecting interstate commerce of a stylistic impersonation of that visual artist, and for other purposes.

Introduced Beth Van Duyne (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9112 aims to grant visual artists exclusive rights over the commercial use and public distribution of any stylistic impersonations of their work. This means that artists would have control over how their artistic style is used in commerce, particularly in relation to interstate commerce, ensuring they can authorize or prohibit such uses.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9112 argue that the bill empowers visual artists by protecting their creative integrity and financial interests. They believe it will help prevent unauthorized exploitation of artists' styles, fostering a more respectful and equitable environment for creators in the art community.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9112 express concerns that the bill may stifle creativity and artistic expression by imposing restrictions on how artists can use stylistic influences from others. Some worry it could lead to excessive legal disputes over artistic style, potentially hindering innovation in the visual arts sector.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Commerce

While there are no direct industry overlaps detected between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, there is notable lobbying activity in the policy area related to visual artists and intellectual property rights. The Jackson Group, LLC, which has connections to multiple donors, has contributed a total of $250,000 across various entities, indicating a significant interest in influencing legislation that could affect commercial exploitation rights. This raises questions about potential motivations behind the bill, especially given the substantial amounts involved. Voters should be aware that while there is no direct conflict, the financial interests of lobbyists may still influence the legislative process.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
SPRAY FOAM COALITION SPRAY FOAM COALITION $60,000
SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC $50,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
GREEN OCEANS EDNEXUS ADVISORS, LLC $22,500
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed
RIDE GROUP LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
CRESCENTA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAPITOL CORE GROUP, INC. undisclosed
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP undisclosed
SPACECONNECT ASSOCIATION SALT POINT STRATEGIES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us