H.R. 9094

H.R. 9094: To appropriate sums for the Secretary of Agriculture to provide block grants to States for losses of revenue as a consequence of certain freezes or cold weather conditions.

Introduced C. Franklin (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9094 is a bill that allocates funds to the Secretary of Agriculture, allowing them to provide block grants to individual states. These grants are intended to help states compensate for revenue losses that result from certain freezing temperatures or cold weather conditions that negatively impact agricultural production.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9094 have praised the bill as a necessary measure to protect farmers and agricultural businesses from the financial hardships caused by unexpected cold weather. They argue that timely assistance can help stabilize local economies and ensure the sustainability of the agricultural sector.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9094 have expressed concerns about the potential for misuse of funds and the effectiveness of block grants in addressing the root causes of agricultural revenue loss. Some have also argued that the bill may not adequately address the needs of all affected farmers, particularly smaller operations that may struggle to access the grants.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The analysis of H.R. 9094 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter, which focuses on agricultural block grants for revenue losses due to cold weather, and the sponsor C. Franklin's top donor industries, which are primarily health professionals and retirees. The significant contributions from health professionals totaling $120 million and retirees at $37.5 million do not indicate a vested interest in agricultural funding or disaster relief related to weather conditions. Additionally, while there is some lobbying activity in the agricultural sector, the amounts disclosed are relatively modest, with the highest being $45,000 from Steelships, LLC. This suggests that while there is some lobbying present, it does not create a substantial conflict of interest for the sponsor regarding this specific bill. Voters should be aware that the financial connections do not directly influence the legislative intent of this bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
STEELSHIPS, LLC CONSCIENCE POINT CONSULTING, INC. $45,000
SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS THE FARLEY GROUP, INC. $30,000
PARATEK PHARMACEUTICALS PARATEK PHARMACEUTICALS $20,000
SAN JUAN SOUTHERN PAIUTE TRIBE THE FARLEY GROUP, INC. $15,000
CHURCH ALLIANCE K&L GATES, LLP $10,000
GIFDA RULON & WHITE GOVERNANCE STRATEGIES $10,000
ASSOCIATION FOR PROFESSIONALS IN INFECTION CONTROL AND EPIDEMIOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOR PROFESSIONALS IN INFECTION CONTROL AND EPIDEMIOLOGY undisclosed
PHARMATROPHIX, INC. FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) undisclosed
PGA TOUR, INC. FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) undisclosed
RESPONSIVE GOV ACTION THE RABEN GROUP undisclosed
KERECIS INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
BINTI, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
VERTIV GROUP CORPORATION AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
TERRA-GEN, LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
PHILIPS CONTINENTAL STRATEGY, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding C. Franklin, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us